T-Mobile One's unlimited data plan isn't quite as unlimited as advertised—especially when it comes to tethering. We'll show you three ways to get what you paid for while using mobile data on. Cloud architects and managers looking for a simpler introduction to the world of cloud security will benefit greatly from this talk. Using the 12 steps as a guide, attendees will be able to underst.
I am using OpenVPN and whilst I can generate certificates using easyrsa just fine I don't really understand the settings in the easyrsa vars file:
Can anyone explain these settings ? Thanks in advance.
ilium007ilium007
1 Answer
These are the settings for the certificate (certificate is a public key + (this) info signed by a Certificate authority).
So in your case, these are you country (where you live, where your company is), province (same), city (same), organization name, email, common name (unique for this CA), name, and organizational unit - in this order.
The last two lines are a path and a pin for PKCS11 (usually for smartcards).
I guess you're using easy-rsa; if you don't set this variables, it asks you for them, when you run the tool to generate a certificate.
mulazmulaz
Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged openvpnpki or ask your own question.
I'm very new to pfSense, but got requested to configure one for the company.
I've almost got everything configured, but am stuck at how to let all our WANsgo through one uplink address. From what I am hearing, this should be possibleto accomplish. I've tried looking it up on both the pfSense Guide as well asthe forums, but since I can't find a related situation to mine, I hereby ask youguys for some help.
What it looks like now (with example WAN IP's):
WAN1: 000.000.000.58 with internal IP addresses on LAN1: 192.168.1.1 - 192.168.1.245WAN2: 000.000.000.61 with internal IP addresses on LAN2: 192.168.2.1 - 192.168.2.245WAN3: 000.000.000.59 with internal IP addresses on LAN3: 192.168.3.1 - 192.168.3.245
The way I have it set up now is as follows:
-First I configured all the interfaces, whereas I now have 3 WAN interfaces with Static IPv4addresses configured. Example: WAN1 interace has a static IP of 000.000.000.59 and anIPv4 Upstream Gateway: 000.000.000.57 (which would be the broadcast address for all WANs).
The problems start right here, because I can't add this address to anymore interfaces, because 'italready exists', but isn't selectable from the drop-down menu. This is one of the reasons why wewant one WAN interface to handle all three of our WAN addresses with one uplink address.
So the question in short: is there a way to have one uplink/upstream address for all WANs.And if so, is there also a way to have just one WAN interface and three LAN interfaces in thefollowing way:
WAN interface must have an uplink/upstream gateway of: 000.000.000.57 for the followingWAN addresses: 000.000.000.58, 000.000.000.59 and 000.000.000.61 whereas
WAN1: 000.000.000.58 = for LAN1 interface w/ internal range of: 192.168.1.1 - 192.168.1.245WAN2: 000.000.000.61 = for LAN2 interface w/ internal range of: 192.168.2.1 - 192.168.2.245WAN3: 000.000.000.59 = for LAN3 interface w/ internal range of: 192.168.3.1 - 192.168.3.245
WAN interface is not going to get a DHCP function, because it needs to be all three of theWAN addresses. The LAN interfaces are going to get the DHCP function for the ranges listed above.
In other words
- all traffic from the 192.168.1.x range must go through the WAN interface as000.000.000.58 and then through the uplink of: 000.000.000.57
- all traffic from the 192.168.2.x range must go through the WAN interface as000.000.000.61 and then through the uplink of: 000.000.000.57
- all traffic from the 192.168.3.x range must go through the WAN interface as000.000.000.59 and then through the uplink of: 000.000.000.57
Can this be done, yes or no?
If you need any more information, feel free to ask and I'll happily elaborate.
Thank you very much in advance!
Grtz,
Jeff
Edit:
Rephrase:So what we want is to have just one WAN interface to carry over 3 WAN ip adresses
(in total 4, since the interface needs one as well).WAN IP subnet: 255.255.255.248WAN interface static IP: xxx.xxx.xxx.62/29WAN distributed IP1: xxx.xxx.xxx.58 which would need to be connected to LAN
interface 1, which should have DHCP on for a range of 192.168.1.10 to 192.168.1.245WAN distributed IP2: xxx.xxx.xxx.59 which would need to be connected to LAN
interface 2, which should have DHCP on for a range of 192.168.2.10 to 192.168.2.245WAN distributed IP3: xxx.xxx.xxx.60 which would need to be connected to LAN
interface 3, which should have DHCP on for a range of 192.168.3.10 to 192.168.3.245
What I've done so far:
I've configured the WAN interface as follows:
Static IPv4IPv4 address: xxx.xxx.xxx.62IPv4 Upstream Gateway: xxx.xxx.xxx.57IPv6 none.
I've configured the LAN interfaces as follows:
Static IPv4IPv4 address: 192.168.1.1*IPv4 Upstream Gateway: none
*for lan2 i've used 192.168.2.1 and for lan3 i've used 192.168.3.1
Services>DHCP server
WAN interface: disabled
LAN interfaces: enabled, only filled in the ranges accordingly (i.e. for lan1
192.168.1.10>192.168.1.245, for lan2 192.168.2.10>192.168.2.245, for lan3
192.168.3.10>192.168.3.245).
Made 3 virtual IP's:
Type: Proxy ARPInterface: WANIP Address(es): Type: Single Address: xxx.xxx.xxx.58
Type: Proxy ARPInterface: WANIP Address(es): Type: Single Address: xxx.xxx.xxx.59
Type: Proxy ARPInterface: WANIP Address(es): Type: Single Address: xxx.xxx.xxx.60/29
Last but not least, I configured the Outbound NAT as follows:
Interface: WANProto: anySource: Type: Network Address: 192.168.1.0/24 Destination: any Translation: xxx.xxx.xxx.58/29
Interface: WANProto: anySource: Type: Network Address: 192.168.2.0/24 Destination: any Translation: xxx.xxx.xxx.59/29
Interface: WANProto: anySource: Type: Network Address: 192.168.3.0/24 Destination: any Translation: xxx.xxx.xxx.60/29
I know I've either done something wrong or I've forgotten about something,because what's happening now is that I can ping nearly every address from myLAN1 interface (which has the 192.168.1.1 range) but not from the other LANinterfaces.
Example: from LAN1 interface I can ping the following addresses:
xxx.xxx.xxx.62192.168.1.1192.168.2.1192.168.3.1
Another thing that is happening is that I can use all threegateways on the LAN1 interface to get into the WebConfigurator(so instead of just being able to connect via 192.1368.1.1, I canalso connect using 192.168.2.1 and 192.168.3.1).
Now, when I switch interface however to LAN2 or LAN3, I amnot able to ping any IP adres, not even the 'gateway' addressesand I can't log into the WebConfigurator.
Example:
From the LAN2 interface (with range 192.168.2.10>192.168.2.245)I can't ping the following addresses:
xxx.xxx.xxx.62192.168.1.1192.168.2.1192.168.3.1
Also, now I can only log into the WebConfigurator via 192.168.2.1, not via 1.1 or
3.1, which is what I want.
It seems to me now that it kinda works, but only on the first LAN interface, since that'sthe interface where I can ping every IP. What seems off though is that from that firstLAN1 interface (192.168.1.1 range) I can use 192.168.1.1, 192.168.2.1 and 192.168.3.1 tolog into the WebConfigurator, as if all IP's are connected to that interface somehow.
Can someone please explain what I'm doing wrong here?
Thanks :)
jvandeleur
jvandeleurjvandeleur
2 Answers
On your WAN Interface, add one IP. then Go to Firewall > Virtual IP's and add the others to the interface.
Your gateway should now listen on all 4 Ips addresses on the one Interface
Do the same for your LAN IP's on the LAN interface
and now the fun... you will have to create many rules to ensure traffic goes where its needs to and nat's out the right IP address (if thats a concern). this can be tricky but the webui can be very helpful. I would also recommend that you use Firewall > Aliases as you can tie multi ports, IP's, urls etc into one string'd alias and apply where you may not be able to use multiple items.
user3258557user3258557
I dont know what you have heard , but pfsense co-founder said 'no' (2 years agoo but it should be relevent) :DReference - https://superuser.com/questions/823191/why-different-ips-required-to-monitor-multi-wan-in-pfsense
Regarding combining the WANS on one interface - I am a bit confused about what you really want and the IP's you have provide, could you add a subnetmask too?You want to place all WAN links to one interface duo lack of ethernet slot ? What you want to achieve, it might be a better way of doing this.
If you want to add multiple subnets to one interface - I would separate them in to VLANs and put them through 1 interface as Trunk.
Community♦
Vasil Svilenov NikolovVasil Svilenov Nikolov